It was the Bee Gees that asked, “How can you mend a broken
heart?” They didn't seem to have any idea.
|
Bioartificial hearts may one
day be the answer to North America's donor shortage problem. |
We now have an answer. After three years of research, Dr. Doris
Taylor and her team at the Center for Cardiovascular Repair at
the University of Minnesota announced Jan. 13, 2008 that they have
devised a way to bring a dead heart back to life.
It’s a delicate process, but head researcher and director of the center
Dr. Taylor says she foresees the "bioartificial heart" technology
will be developed for human use in the future.
“Our first goal was proof of concept to convince ourselves we could get
it to work,” she says.
Dr. Taylor's experiment used dead rat and pig hearts to conduct
whole organ decellularization. Decellularization is the process
of removing all cells from an organ, leaving only the exterior
framework or “matrix” intact. In order to remove
the cells, the scientists injected a detergent wash (like a soap and water mixture)
into the dead heart to clean out all the inactive cells inside. The wash forced
the internal cells to disintegrate, leaving the exterior “scaffold” in place.
“The scaffold can remain alive because it is a collagen structure and made
of protein,” says Dr. Marc Ruel, a cardiac surgeon at the
University of Ottawa Heart Institute who did not participate in
the research.
Armed with a
clean and empty heart structure, Dr. Taylor's team injected the
shells with live heart cells before placing the structure into
a sterile environment so it could grow.
Those cells multiplied. They mimicked the pattern of cell activity
in living heart tissue, with certain cells pumping and others contracting.
And after eight days, the reconstructed heart was beating.
Long shot, long way off
“It’s
a nice study but it’s certainly not something that’s going to affect
a patient’s life in the next five, ten, fifteen years,” says
Dr. Ruel.
Dr. Ruel says he suspects the technology will take years to develop
for human use, if at all. The heart created in the lab was beating
at a rate 15 per cent of what it would during an embryonic stage,
and at only two per cent of an adult heart.
"It's a long, long shot," he says.
But Dr. Taylor says her team is already gearing up to improve
the weak heartbeat. The next step will be to add more cells to
the structure and to determine the best lab environments. She says
while getting the technology ready for humans may be years away,
the promise of further experimentation is around the corner.
“There’s nothing saying we can’t work quickly to do the transplants
(into rats). It’s just a matter of resources,” Dr.
Taylor says.
Resources might be one of the biggest challenges
in furthering the technology. Not only do the researchers need
raw materials to create the hearts, they need equipment. The size
and cost of the equipment grows as the experiments start to include
larger animals, says Dr. Taylor. A machine that cost $50,000 for
the rat heart experiment could cost 10 times more for a larger-scale
operation, she says.
But Dr. Taylor says she’s confident this technology will
be poked and prodded and polished enough that one day heart disease
patients might choose to grow a bioartificial heart containing
their own cells. Another choice, another option, another way to
try and relieve some stress off the American donor pool.
The reality is, like our southern neighbours, Canada's organ
donor pool is more like a wading pool. The number of people needing
organ transplants far outweighs the number that actually receives
one. In 2007 in Ontario, there were 1,676 people on the waiting
list for all organ transplants, according to the province's Trillium
Gift of Life Network. Only 531 received an organ.
If developed for human use, the bioartificial heart technology
could provide more options to help relieve the donor shortage.
Organs past their donor prime (anything older than four hours cannot
be used for transplant) could serve as the scaffold to grow a bioartificial
heart, says Dr. Taylor. The other option is to turn to animals
like pigs that have organs similarly sized to humans.
“We already use pig valves for human transplantation. It’s not unreasonable
to think about using pig tissue,” she says.
|
Scientists say they are
hopeful the bioartificial heart technology will be developed
for human use. |
Dr. Taylor says she hopes the procedure, if developed for human
use, will be able to minimize the risk of rejection and subsequent
immunosuppression. According to the Heart and Stroke Foundation,
immunosuppression results in parts of the immune system becoming
useless. Sometimes this happens naturally, and other times, like
in the case of organ donation, immunosuppression is induced with
drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the organ. Side
effect: The drugs work on the whole immune system, so you're less
likely to be able to battle colds and viruses.
But if bioartificial hearts become the new norm, immunosuppression
would likely be less of an issue because the recipient would have
an organ containing his or her own injected cells, Dr. Taylor says.
“We would use the stem cells to make the scaffold somewhat
more invisible to the recipient. The hope would be that over time,
as the cells in the new organ replace the proteins (in the scaffold),
it would become completely your own,” she
says. “But we don’t know that for sure. The prediction
is that you might need (immunosuppression medication) for a while
but not forever.”
Dr. Ruel points out that before bioartificial hearts are refined
and approved for human use, bigger and better technology could
become the new norm.
"The
question is, is it going to be easier to recreate a heart from
scratch or to optimize an existing machine . . . the answer is
probably the latter," he
says.
Heart transplants, however, are clearly not without their complications,
says Dr. Taylor.
“One
of the major problems with getting a heart transplant is you’re
trading one disease for another, like high blood pressure. The
hope is we could preclude that,” she says.
|