Banding together

On the outskirts of the small town of Admiral, Sask. Photo by Matthew Olson
A Saskatchewan administrative association says some rural communities are struggling to stay afloat in the 21st century, and there are so many spread across the province it’s difficult to provide assistance to all of them.

Saskatchewan’s rural and urban areas are divided into municipalities, and each municipality has its own head. There are 296 rural municipalities in Saskatchewan, easily the largest number for any province in Canada.

According to recent census data from Statistics Canada, Saskatchewan has 950 distinct census subdivisions. A census subdivision is any area treated as a municipality for statistical purposes, including everything from cities to rural municipalities.

That means Saskatchewan has the highest number of census subdivisions per capita of any province in the country, at a rate of 86.5 per 100,000 people. By comparison, Ontario has just over four census subdivisions per capita. Saskatchewan has a lot fewer people, and a lot more places to take care of.

Jay Meyer (left) and Kelsay Reimer (right) work with rural municipalities around Saskatchewan. Photo by Matthew Olson.
“We’re struggling right now with having enough administrators right now to administer these 296 RMs,” Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities president Jay Meyer said. “It’s tough to recruit [new people] if you don’t have administration in your office managing it.”

The rural population once dwarfed the urban population in Saskatchewan. Now, those percentages have shifted drastically.

Since the numbers were tracked dating back to the early 20th century, the population has been swinging from rural to urban. In 1966, the rural population of Saskatchewan still outnumbered the urban population. Today, more than two thirds of the province’s people are located in urban centres.

Meyer said that when families leave the smallest rural centres it can be hard to attract them to a different rural centre over urban hubs.

“I think there’s a concern… As those small communities start dying those people are going somewhere,” Meyer said. “The question is where. Are the they going to the next large rural community, or are they heading to the big city?”

“As those small communities start dying those people are going somewhere… the question is where.”

- Jay Meyer,

President, SARM

The Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities is a group of advocates and policy makers for rural communities. They are based in the capital of Regina, but regularly speak to the municipalities across the province.

As Meyer puts it, it can be a daunting task to make sure all the municipalities have a plan for the future.

“We’re struggling right now with having enough administrators out there to administer these 296 (municipalities),” he said. “Never mind recruiting them all to three and a half hours away from … Regina or Saskatoon.”

Location, location, location

Old train tracks near Highway 13 in southern Saskatchewan. Photo by Matthew Olson
Meyer said the drop in populations for these small towns happens very gradually, and is usually exacerbated by the loss of potential employers, such as schools and clinics.

“The less people you have … the less chance that the hospital is going to stay open or the schools are going to stay open,” he said.

The lack of available services for small communities was a problem identified by Professor Rose Olfert. In her book Saskatchewan’s Communities in the 21st Century, Olfert and her colleagues outline six community “trade centre” classifications. The classifications are based off the number of, and access to, services for that community. And out of the 598 Saskatchewan communities that made up Olfert’s data, most of them fell into the lowest category.

The University of Saskatchewan’s Rose Olfert is an expert of rural economics. Photo by Matthew Olson.
Called the “Minimum Convenience Centre” category, communities in this section have “perhaps a gasoline station or a restaurant,” according to the book. The number of communities that fall into this category has risen steadily since the data collection began in the 1960s.

According to Olfert, it’s those lower classification communities that can’t hope to sustain themselves into the future.

“Ultimately, unless those basic trends of population loss and change in the nature of the functions and services … somehow change, you know, the writing is on the wall,” Olfert said.

The struggle of sustaining services in rural communities is one well known to the government as well. The Growing Forward 2 policy framework set in place by the Ministry of Agriculture outlines how the government supports that business sector in the province. Jonathan Greuel, the executive director of the Ministry of Agriculture’s policy branch, said drawing people and services to remote areas of the province is a major point of consideration in that framework.

“Just getting access to mechanics and labour … the distances and the times involved, that’s a concern,” Greuel said. “Getting access to labour in rural areas, that is becoming a bit of a constraint.”

Greuel said that access and retention of labour for farms has been identified as a “potential impediment of future growth,” but that the Ministry of Agriculture doesn’t take dwindling populations into consideration.

“We’re more concerned about the competitiveness of the sector, and growing,” Greuel said, adding that population questions fall to other government ministries.

Consolidation is the key

Many old buildings along Saskatchewan farmland are crumbling. Photo by Matthew Olson
As services continue to be shuttered in smaller communities, the best hope is for close settlements to band together and share what they have, according to Meyer.

“Collaboration and working together is number one. You have to start sharing some resources,” Meyer said.

Communities lose the capacity to sustain the number of different services they once did after the population drops below a certain level. Towns like Scotsguard and Crichton all once played homeservices like to shops, train stations, post offices – all the trappings of a sustainable community.

“You lose your car dealership, you lose twenty-five people – that’s staff,” Meyer said. “Well, times that by two or maybe three because you have … [spouses] and you have kids that are leaving, and that affects the high schools or the elementary schools.”

“It kind of spirals all the way down.”

Kelsay Reimer, the acting director of policy research for the association, said the best way for these communities to survive is to work together. By consolidating their resources, she said, small communities can use the funds allocated to them by the government more efficiently.

“You get more communities and more voices together, you have a louder voice,” Reimer said. “So more can be accomplished.”

The provincial government provides funding through its Municipal Revenue Sharing plan. In the 2018-2019 budget, $67.98 million was provided to rural communities. That’s the lowest it’s been since the 2011-2012 budget.

“You get more communities and more voices together, you have a louder voice.”

- Kelsay Reimer,

Acting Director of policy research, SARM

As more communities decline and the rural population becomes more thinly spread, Reimer said local communities need to make agreements amongst themselves to best use that money. Meyer and Reimer suggest that closely situated communities need to identify who will supply what services to the area. For example, one community gets the grocery store, while the next gets the auto repair shop.

In theory, there should be more than enough communities for rural Saskatchewan to create an effective sharing strategy, they said. Statistics Canada lists the province as having 258 villages in addition to the 296 rural municipalities, meaning there are many population centres scattered throughout the province.

But as Meyer puts it, finding the most effective way for municipalities to organize themselves isn’t a simple task. With limited finances and results expected quickly enough to impact the next election, the reeves of Saskatchewan’s rural municipalities can sometimes struggle to think long-term.

“Give more money… and they can build a lagoon or a lift station or a road or a bridge,” he said. “But I mean we need to start looking … five, 10 years down the line.”

That reality is reflected in the numbers. According to Statistics Canada, 12 municipalities in Saskatchewan have dissolved since the last census in 2011.

Planning for a future that might not exist

The sunset near Saskatchewan Landing Provincial Park. Photo by Matthew Olson
“Sometimes it’s tough for elected officials because they need to see results in four years,” said Meyer. “That’s when the next election is.”

Because of the lack of training and understanding for how to best spend money on development, many communities don’t do a lot of future planning. Meyer said it’s something his association tries to push home for the reeves of rural municipalities. But with 296 of them to consider, and an elected reeve in charge of each, there’s a lot of different administrators with a lot of different opinions.

Some of those reeves don’t have a large population base to take care of. The largest rural municipality, Corman Park No. 344, has a population of 8,568, but surrounds the major hub of Saskatoon.

And Glen McPherson No. 46, the smallest rural municipality in terms of population, is home to only 72 people. But being in the southernmost reaches of the province, it’s far more isolated.

The concept of amalgamation – bringing together multiple rural municipalities into fewer, larger municipalities – has been discussed as an option for decades. Economists like Olfert say it’s the best way to ensure the survival of rural communities. But many of those living in those municipalities don’t like the idea of amalgamation.

“I’m not saying that we’re going to get forced into it… before we do, we should maybe come up with some strategies ourselves.”

- Jay Meyer,

President, SARM

In 2000, the then-NDP provincial government commissioned a report from a University of Saskatchewan political scientist to look into the benefits of amalgamation. His report proposed amalgamating all local governments in Saskatchewan into 125 municipal districts to save on expenses. It was staunchly opposed by Meyer’s association and the Saskatchewan Party.

“It’s like anything – it’s how it’s communicated, how is it done, is there incentive involved in it,” Meyer said. “But it almost has to be (the municipalities’) idea.”

An emailed statement from the Government of Saskatchewan’s Ministry of Government Relations said there are “no plans to force restructuring in the province,” and said local authorities have the best understanding of whether amalgamation is the right step.

 

Whether due to nostalgia or financial stability, the idea of amalgamation hasn’t gone over well in other parts of Canada. The provincial government in Manitoba passed legislation in 2013 requiring municipalities of fewer than 1,000 people to amalgamate with others by 2015. The legislation brought the total number of municipalities in the province from 197 down to 137. The Association of Manitoba Municipalities took the government to court over the legislation, with then-association president Doug Dobrowolski calling it “not fair and transparent.”

If the same legislation were applied in Saskatchewan, it would force 259 out of 296 rural municipalities to amalgamate.

“I’m not saying that we’re going to get forced into it,” Meyer said. “What I’m saying is before we do, we should maybe come up with some strategies ourselves.”

Meyer and Reimer both agree there is some concern with communities dwindling in the prairies, but insist the small rural settlements can thrive. They just need to have a plan.

“I would venture to guess if I went back today and looked at the population, the communities that had the will probably maintain theirs and the ones that didn’t have the will probably declined,” Reimer said.

Reimer also identified broadband connectivity as a key issue to help keep rural communities connected to the urban world and each other. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission declared broadband internet to be a “basic telecommunications service” in 2016, which many speculated would pave the way for better internet access in rural communities across the country.

But quality internet connectivity is still a luxury in a lot of small rural communities, Reimer said. And that can impact quality of life – and the ability to attract anyone to more remote areas.

“If you don’t have that accessibility it’s going to be hard to recruit professionals … or even start up small businesses in small towns,” Meyer said. “Not everybody has that accessibility to internet to do a transfer … or pay their bills online.”

On their own

Train tracks near the now-vanished town of Romance. Photo by Matthew Olson
In an emailed statement, the Government of Saskatchewan did not respond to questions regarding any concern over shrinking rural populations, instead highlighting the funding provided through other government programs.

Between the revenue sharing program and the government’s stance on amalgamation, it seems the province is willing to let rural Saskatchewan succeed or fail on its own merits – a prospect Meyer believes most municipalities would be fine accepting.

“I think we’re pushing for strong governance,” Meyer said. “The provincial government … on one hand, municipalities don’t want them involved. But then in the meantime, when things aren’t good, they want them involved.”

Olfert doesn’t share the association’s optimism, calling the gradual shutdown of services and changes in the communities “symptoms” of an irreversible decline.

“Ultimately, if those underlying factors continue it’s going to go,” she said. “You can slow it down a bit, but I think it’s just what people do.”

“You can’t hold back the tide.”

“You can’t hold back the tide.”